Relationships are at the heart of Buddhism. And such a statement is true in many senses!
First, Buddhism very much looks into how we relate to phenomena.
The analysis starts by questioning 5 aggregates: our senses (and their limitations), our emotional tones upon perceiving something, our perceptions or pattern matchings, our conceptualizations / projections / expectations / intentions, and our (conscious or subconscious) reactivity.
But the analysis also looks at how any response establishes a relationship… by discerning / projecting actor, action and object. And as the response might be biased (be it by unexamined impulses or by constructive, wholesome mental cultivation!) then specific types of response might be studied as such. Hence, e.g. in Mahāyāna Buddhism, one might consider three levels of “compassionate response”: conventional1, ultimate2 and objectless / unconditioned3.
Fundamentally, that's what life is about: relationships (to every experience coming our way), and how to cultivate constructive ones. Interestingly, the goal of holy life might be to cease the entanglements, the knots, and the drama… but that's not the same as ceasing all relationships!
Second, be it addressed to lay people or to monastics, Buddhism provides pragmatic, practical advice on relationships. In a sense, it acknowledges that we're social animals, and even the recluse or the hermit sets a standard or acts as a role model for others. So Buddhism has some advice to share on setting up growth-supportive conditions through relationships. It looks at familial relationships, business relationships, friends, foes, who one associate with, etc.
Speaking of which…
Dharma.direct was founded on the idea of mutual support between Buddhist practitioners (of various seniority).
This can only work if readers log in, comment, ask questions or provide answers, launch conversations / debates, give feedback, etc.4
We're systematically calling for authors… on any topic, in any format, and for any section (theme of the issue, debate, philosophy, or meditation). We'd be extremely happy to have more women among the authors, as those we reached out to have been too busy so far to contribute and men end up overly represented. Without falling into quotas, we can pay attention to such imbalances and try to mend them.
The Right concentration then right mindfulness article was the most publicly read so far, with no less than 162 non-registered reads… Most magazine articles have above 50 non-registered reads (incl. 102, 111, 115 and op.cit. 162)… To register on Dharma.direct, one only needs to provide an email address, no personal data; and, no data is sold for profit to mass-surveillance companies. Yet, we only count 36 members —not all of whom even log in when they read articles— and only a handful ever commented.
Practitioners can only support each other if they engage with each other. The saṅgha cannot be reduced to some content creators, anonymously read over the internet. Keeping a ‘safe’ distance, avoiding any personal responsibility, doesn't help personal / spiritual growth! Dharma.direct's editorial strategy favours original content, from authors ready to engage online with their readers; availability (to provide clarifications, to dispel confusions, to discuss, to accompany) is preferred over celebrity status; so it's a waste of opportunity if it's then transformed into passive entertainment.
Please join if you haven't already. And, please, log in when you use the site… so you can see the members-only comments (as well as the members-only threads in the Conversations tab), and interact with others.